Microsoft Roaming Rights will be changed

Understanding Changes to Microsoft Roaming Rights: Insights from February’s Product Terms Document

February’s Microsoft Product Terms Document brings significant changes to how Microsoft Roaming Rights will be handled for Windows Enterprise and VDA.

From the February Product Terms:

4.14 Roaming Rights Retirement for Windows Enterprise and Windows VDA

Customers with active SA for Windows Enterprise or Windows VDA retain Roaming Rights through the later of:

  • the end of their existing Enrollment or Agreement term, or
  • January 31, 2017

Current Licensing Requirements for Windows VDA Roaming Use Rights As per Microsoft licensing Brief:

Windows VDA Rights allow for a licensed device or user to access virtual Windows desktops either remotely and/or locally, depending on how the device or user is licensed. You can license devices or users for Windows VDA rights in the following ways:

– License devices with Windows Software Assurance or Windows VDA subscription on a per device basis.

– License users with Windows Software Assurance or Windows VDA subscription on a per user basis.

 Roaming Use Definition

The single primary user of the device licensed with active Windows Software Assurance or Windows VDA subscription (work device) can do the following:

At any one time, remotely access one or more of the permitted instances running on your servers (for example, in your data center) from a third-party device.

At any one time, run one instance of the software in a virtual OSE on a qualifying third-party device.

When the primary user is on your or your affiliates’ company premises, Roaming Use Rights are not applicable.

These Windows VDA Rights and the corresponding Roaming Use Rights are non-perpetual and are only active as long as the underlying Software Assurance for Windows, Windows VDA subscription, and/or Windows CSL is active.

Potential Licensing Impact: A Per-User VDA subscription will also be required for Roaming Use rights.

If you have questions or concerns about the impact of this change we encourage you to contact one of our unbiased licensing experts for a free initial consultation.

Microsoft Changes Minimum Enterprise Agreement Qualified User/Device Count

Change is one constant in the Microsoft licensing world.   Recently Microsoft has announced a rather significant change to their Enterprise Agreement (EA) program.  Effective July 1, 2016 the minimum commitment to the Enterprise Agreement (EA) program will increase from 250 qualified users/devices to 500 qualified users/devices.

 What does this mean for Clients?

Existing EA customers who do not meet the new minimum commitments can obviously continue within their current agreements until expiration.  At that point, it appears existing EA customers will have the option to extend their existing agreements by 36 months.  After the extension expires they will have to transition to either the Microsoft Products and Services Agreement (MPSA) or the Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) agreements if they do not meet the minimum 500 users/device count.

 Why is Microsoft Making this Change and What Should I expect?

For many years the EA program was the core licensing vehicle that Microsoft drove any and all clients (who met the qualifications) towards.   Its clear now that Microsoft is incredibly focussed on their cloud offerings and the MPSA/CSP programs are better positioned to drive that agenda.   Expect Microsoft and their partners to begin aggressively attempting to move clients onto the MPSA/CSP programs rather than extending their EAs.

What steps should I take?

Contact MetrixData360 to have a free initial consultation to evaluate your Microsoft licensing options with one of our licensing experts.  We are not a Microsoft partner and offer unbiased licensing guidance to our clients.  Our focus is to reduce your Microsoft costs and help you negotiate the best possible Microsoft contract.

MetrixData360 Optimizes Our Own Office 365 Subscriptions

Want to save 37% off your Office 365 deployments and your annual subscription costs?  Read up below to see how we did just this for our tiny Office 365 E3 deployment here at MetrixData360.

Many of you may not know this, but we use Office 365 to run our business.  It wasn’t our first choice (in fact we used to run on Google), but we ended up migrating to it for one very simple reason:

  • Outlook Calendars and Google just don’t work well. We would accept meetings on our iPhones and with the one-way sync between Google and calendaring (if you accept in Google it will populate to your phone but not the other way around) we were missing important meetings.

When we decided to move to Office 365 we purchased E3 subscriptions for our 12 users.  It was just the simplest thing for us to do.  As we were doing budgeting for 2016, we were looking at the costs of all of our subscriptions (Office 365, DropBox, WebEx, etc.) and realized the annual fees on all of these were getting out of hand so we decided to follow our own advice and optimized our licensing.

For various reasons we will continue to use Dropbox and WebEx (even though we have the ability to use OneDrive and Skype for Business).  Simplicity and functionality rules for us here at MetrixData360.

OneDrive does not work well with Mac (and a few of us use those).  The only way to get access is via the web client which is a very cumbersome way to access file storage technologies.  Even though they have a OneDrive for business client for Mac (Beta), after many hours of trying we never were able to get it to work correctly.  Microsoft really has a lot of work to do on this one.

Similarly, Skype for Business is not as good as WebEx for meetings.  We use the Instant Message features of Skype but not the online meetings (we were finding it was hard to manage, calls dropping, poor call quality when doing VOIP, etc).  One of our biggest reasons for continuing on WebEx however was for marketing.  WebEx is so much more feature rich for recording and doing webinars, which are very important to our business.

When we looked at our usage we found that half of our users really only needed Exchange Online Plan 1.  We swapped them out immediately and dropped our number of E3 subscriptions.  The net was a 37% reduction in our annual costs of Office 365.  I hesitate to think of the impact to the bottom line of our largest clients (100’’s of thousands if not millions of dollars are being wasted) that are overpaying Microsoft.

We have some exciting news that we will be sharing shortly.  We are working with our partners over at Block 64 on a new service offering that we will be launching in the first quarter of 2016 to help companies who use Office 365 get the same results we did.  We plan on automating the review and showing you how to optimize those Office 365 subscriptions across your organization to save your precious budget dollars!  Stay tuned!

MetrixData360 specializes in helping organizations who are facing a Microsoft audit with assistance through every stage of the audit process.  Our goal is to reduce any compliance gaps you may have and ensure that you are only paying for the software and services you really need.   Contact us today to book a free consultation to see if we can help you!

Not Understanding The Complexity of Licensing Microsoft SQL Can Cost You

Avoiding Costly Mistakes: Mastering the Complexity of Microsoft SQL Licensing

What You Google When You’re Being Audited by Microsoft

Facing a Microsoft Audit? Here’s What You Might Be Searching for on Google!

Have you received an audit letter from Microsoft? Here’s a glimpse of what you may search for on Google!

Metrixdata360.com

Gartner Encore Presentation

The Many Levels Of Negotiations With The Mega Vendors: Microsoft and Oracle

Just some of what you will learn:
Audits/SAM engagements are on the rise, why?

What do these engagements do for Microsoft and Oracle?

This isn’t about compliance, it’s all about… ?

What’s the Difference When Purchasing Office Through Microsoft Office 365 vs Traditional Licensing Models?

A lot of people think that when they are purchasing Microsoft Office Pro through Office 365 they’re buying it and accessing it in the Cloud.

That’s not necessarily the case.

Yes, you can get access to the Office web apps that are in the Cloud, but there’s a fundamental difference in Office. It is the same product, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, but the Office 365 edition is what they call Click-to-Run versus your traditional EA which is just Office Pro Plus.

Click-to-Run vs On-Prem

The difference between Click-to-Run and on-premise is that in Click-to-Run it has to be current. In other words, where most organizations today are not running Office 2016. Most organizations that we see aren’t even running Office 2013. They’re running Office 2010.

With Click-to-Run you have to be current. I believe it’s one year they give you where you can run the older version. If I’m on Click-to-Run 2013 or 2016 in a year it’s only 2016. So, if you think about the challenges organizations have upgrading their desktops around application testing and things like that, they’re going to have to run those more frequently and Microsoft’s just automatically pushing down patches and updates and making changes to it that they have no control over anymore or limited controls.

That’s one thing organizations need to step back and say, “Okay, Click-to-Run may have some complications that don’t make sense for me to use.”

Enterprise Agreements vs Click-to-Run

The other thing is if they buy Office through a traditional EA versus Click-to-Run, it’s user-based versus device-based. That may have some advantages for some customers and it may have some disadvantages for some customers.

Office, although you can now install it on iPads and smartphones and things like that using an Office 365 subscription, in the Enterprise environment we’re not seeing a lot of use of Office on those types of platforms.

It’s really still a traditional desktop or laptop where end-users consume Office. There’s been some playing with it, but we’re not seeing broad adoption in the Enterprise based environment for that.

What’s the difference in an organization that’s a call center where they have three shifts that run through the call center and you have 1,000 devices, or desktops, and 3,000 users?

In a device-based licensing model I pay for 1,000 and for a user-based model I pay for 3,000. There’s something upside down on that equation. You really want to take a look at the environment and figure out does user-based licensing make more sense for you or does device-based licensing for Office make more sense?

Do I want to be forced to go to Run-to-Click where Microsoft is going to push stock or that it has to have an active Office 365 subscription in order to use? Or do I want to stay with the traditional on-premise copy Office and use that one?

If I wanted to stay with the device-based Office but wanted to go to Office 365, add-ons are the perfect way to do that. If we go back to the call center, 3,000 Office 365 USLs, so to speak, 1,000 Office licenses, 3,000 add-ons. Add-ons are a lot cheaper than USLs.

Microsoft Office 365 How Do You Know What You Really Need?

Office 365 licensing is surrounded by a great deal of confusion.  What is Office 365?  What plan do I require?  Do I require the full suite?  Should I purchase User Subscription Licenses or Add-0ns?  It is no secret that Microsoft is aggressively promoting and selling the service.  The key question to ask is what is Office 365?  The most common answers are related to Office 365 E3.  E3 contains Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, SkypeforBusiness Online and Office Professional Plus.  Most people are unaware that you can purchase a single service such as Exchange Online (YES, even in your EA) instead of the bundle.

My experience is that most people relate a desire to move to Exchange Online to purchasing Office 365 E3.  When asked why they are considering Office 365 the answers range from “we want to reduce our email storage costs” or “we plan to move our mailboxes into the cloud”.  Other Online Services seem to garner less interest (although there seems to be a bit more interest in SharePoint Online lately).

What is shocking is how many organizations interpret a desire to move email to the cloud as a need to negotiate an Office 365 E3 deal with Microsoft.  Most simply do not realize that alternatives exist (such as purchasing only Exchange Online).   It could cost millions more if these options are not considered.

If considering a move to the cloud ask the following questions (these are just a few examples):

  • What Services am I really looking to purchase? Is it just Exchange Online?
  • How quickly will a migration occur? How will users be moved?
  • Are all users the same? Do they all require E3?  Do they all require features of Exchange Online Plan 2?
  • What contractual rights exist? What risks or benefits does purchasing one have over the other?
  • Do User Subscription Licenses (USL) or Add-Ons make sense?
  • Have I evaluated the benefits and risks of USLs to Add-Ons?

What about Office?  How does this factor into the decision making criteria?

The short answer is it shouldn’t.  This surprises many people.   Office is a prominent part of the E3 product and does deserve consideration.  An evaluation of purchasing Office 365 Office Professional Plus versus perpetual licenses for Office Professional Plus should be conducted.  Consideration for comparing “Run to Click” to on premise Office, understanding the value/risk of Microsoft pushing updates, the value (if any – it is surprising how often there isn’t any) in user based Office licensing, VDI or BYOD environments and many others.

If negotiating an Office 365 purchase, review the options and consider proposals for:

  •  Exchange Online instead of E3
  • Renewing SA and purchasing add-ons instead of USLs
  • Purchasing licenses through an Office 365 transition versus upfront commitment
  • Buying as you go versus all upfront

It is surprising what can be learned by asking these questions, not to mention the cost savings you may see.

Why Engage a Microsoft Licensing Negotiation Expert?

Why Engage a MetrixData360 Microsoft Licensing Negotiation Expert?

At MetrixData360 we specialize in helping organizations negotiate more effectively with Microsoft in both audit and volume licensing agreement renewal situations.   Our licensing experts know the best-proven ways to get results and lower your Microsoft costs.  Yet some organizations still hesitate to engage third-party experts.  We understand that organizations often have talented, intelligent and experienced people who are responsible for these sorts of Microsoft negotiations, but there are significant limitations on what any internal person can know:

  • They will only have the opportunity to negotiate once every three years
  • The licensing programs will likely have changed since the last Microsoft contract
  • Product lines will have changed

In my mind, I often compare a Microsoft negotiation to buying a car. I’m the type of person who researches everything. When I meet with the salesperson I’m as well prepared as anyone could be. Then we start talking numbers. I ask for the sorts of discounts that I have read on the internet are possible. They tell me no and counter with something far less substantial. We go back and forth and eventually a deal is done but I never feel great about it. I feel like at some point I lost control of the negotiation.  Furthermore, other than walking away I did not really know what levers I could pull to drive important concessions. At the end of the day, I don’t know that I really received a good deal and in the back of my mind, I have a nagging feeling that I may have paid too much.  I realize that comparing an individual buying a car is very different from a company negotiating a multi-million dollar Microsoft licensing contract.  However, despite the differences in scale/scope I strongly feel like this is the way most of us feel during and after they conclude a Microsoft negotiation in either an audit settlement or a contract renewal situation.

How a MetrixData 360 Expert can help in a Microsoft EA Contract Renewal

In our experience most organizations take the following path leading into a Microsoft EA contract renewal/negotiation. They make a list of the products and quantities they require on the new agreement and consider what products can possibly be dropped from the agreement. Once this list is finalized, the Microsoft negotiation typically consists primarily of driving the deepest possible discount off of a set pricing level. The challenge is that in our experience, Microsoft does not and cannot discount their products to the same level as most other software companies. We find many organizations also will request concessions from Microsoft that they (Microsoft) are simply unable to grant. The end result of negotiating in this manner is frustration and disappointment.   Kind of similar to my car buying experience.

Engaging a MetrixData360 licensing expert changes the process dramatically and puts you in control of the Microsoft negotiation. Our experts have negotiated over a billion dollars of Microsoft contracts and we know the process inside out. In close consultation with you, we will work to understand your technical requirements and negotiation objectives. We will build multiple licensing models and provide a risk analysis of each. Finally, we will coach you through the negotiation process.   The way that we drive costs out of renewals is by focusing on the structure of the contract and driving contractual changes that are important to you. These are small requests that can make a big impact on the costs. I have had calls with clients in which we were able to help them to achieve a concession in a single meeting which they had been unsuccessful in negotiating the last two contract negotiation cycles.

 

How a MetrixData360 Licensing Expert can help in a Microsoft Audit/Software Asset Management (SAM) Engagement.

When most people are faced with an auditor who is presenting their deployment data and showing a sizeable gap in their software licensing, they don’t know how to push back, even when the data being presented just feels wrong. The auditor will usually come back with a statement such as, “well this is your deployment data and this is what we have confirmed is deployed.”   They may then point to terms and conditions in your various contracts that back up their position. Sounds pretty hopeless doesn’t it?

Over the past few years Microsoft audits/SAM engagements have become much more common and our experts are helping clients with them on a daily basis.  This day to day experience with Microsoft audits ranging from clients with hundreds of thousands of desktops to a few hundred means that we understand the process inside out. This experience allows us to streamline the whole process for you and avoid wasted cycles. Our experts also know what your contractual rights are and lets you know when you are in a position to decline the auditors’ demands. Without proper guidance, an innocent data request from an auditor could cost you huge dollars if you are unaware you could challenge the request. Microsoft audits/SAM engagements also tend to be productivity black holes which serve to waste the time and energy of your people. This is where you need a MetrixData360 licensing expert who can surface the terms and conditions which will negate the ones the auditor is basing their case on. Our experts know how to negotiate the most favorable settlement possible. We have successfully saved our clients millions of dollars and hundreds of hours of time.

When Should I Contact MetrixData 360?

We can engage at any point in either the Microsoft EA renewal or Microsoft audit/SAM process but its always ideal to be involved early.   Our Licensing Negotiation Experts are always happy to have an introductory call with you to see how we can help you!

Is Office 365 really being deployed?

Insider Insights: How MetrixData360’s Licensing Specialists Decode Microsoft Enterprise Agreements and Office 365 Deployments

MetrixData360 negotiates hundreds of Microsoft Enterprise Agreements (EA) on behalf of its clients every year. As a result, our licensing specialists have a unique insight into the way enterprise organizations are actually using and deploying Office 365. Microsoft has been reporting robust sales numbers for Office 365 (microsofts-q1-shines-office-365-leads-results) but are enterprise businesses actually deploying it? The observations I am about to share with you are based on MetrixData360’s experiences with our clients and partners and are specific to Office 365 cloud based deployments. I make this distinction as these observations do not take into account 3rd party partner hosted solutions as this is not Office 365 (just traditional hosting). Continue reading “Is Office 365 really being deployed?”